
This article from the NY Times is about PowerPoint and the art of criminally boring presentations, found here.
I have always despised PowerPoint presentations, and I thought I was alone. But this author sums up in one sentence exactly why I find it so detestabe
But the relentless and, some critics would say, lazy use of the program as a replacement for real discourse as with the NASA case continues to inspire attacks.That's it! A lazy replacement for real discourse. (Let that ring in your ears for a few minutes).
The laws governing "intellectual property" have grown so expansive in recent years that artists need legal experts to sort them all out. Borrowing from another artwork--as jazz musicians did in the 1930s and Looney Tunes illustrators did in 1940s--will now land you in court. If the current copyright laws had been in effect back in the day, whole genres such as collage, hiphop, and Pop Art might have never have existed.
The irony here couldn't be more stark. Rooted in the U.S. Constitution, copyright was originally intended to facilitate the exchange of ideas but is now being used to stifle it.I love social commentary. Be sure to look at the visual section, and if you missed reading the web end-users license agreement that pops up when you first go to the site, you might want to go again. So. Funny.
Oct.01.03 at 11:55 AM